Search Results

1 of 1
Edit My Search | New Search | Selected Items
thumbnail image
PDF
PDF-1(2.93 MB)
Citation & Export
View statistics
Staff View

Citation & Export
Hide

Simple citation

Burgess, Matthew G. & Costello, Christopher & Fredston-Hermann, Alexa & Pinsky, Malin L. & Gaines, Steven D. & Tilman, David & Polasky, Stephen (2017). Range contraction enables harvesting to extinction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(15), 3945-3950. Retrieved from https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T37084V5

Export

Click here for information about Citation Management Tools at Rutgers.

Statistics
Hide

Description

Range contraction enables harvesting to extinction (2017)
Matthew G. Burgess, Christopher Costello, Alexa Fredston-Hermann, Malin L. Pinsky, Steven D. Gaines, David Tilman, Stephen Polasky
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114(15): 3945-3950.
Link to published version
VersionVersion of Record (VoR)
AbstractEconomic incentives to harvest a species usually diminish as its abundance declines, because harvest costs increase. This prevents harvesting to extinction. A known exception can occur if consumer demand causes a declining species’ harvest price to rise faster than costs. This threat may affect rare and valuable species, such as large land mammals, sturgeons, and bluefin tunas. We analyze a similar but underappreciated threat, which arises when the geographic area (range) occupied by a species contracts as its abundance declines. Range contractions maintain the local densities of declining populations, which facilitates harvesting to extinction by preventing abundance declines from causing harvest costs to rise. Factors causing such range contractions include schooling, herding, or flocking behaviors–which, ironically, can be predator-avoidance adaptations; patchy environments; habitat loss; and climate change. We use a simple model to identify combinations of range contractions and price increases capable of causing extinction from profitable overharvesting, and we compare these to an empirical review. We find that some aquatic species that school or forage in patchy environments experience sufficiently severe range contractions as they decline to allow profitable harvesting to extinction even with little or no price increase; and some high-value declining aquatic species experience severe price increases. For terrestrial species, the data needed to evaluate our theory are scarce, but available evidence suggests that extinction-enabling range contractions may be common among declining mammals and birds. Thus, factors causing range contraction as abundance declines may pose unexpectedly large extinction risks to harvested species.
Persistent URLhttps://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T37084V5
SubjectsAnthropogenic Allee Effect, Hyperstable, Endangered species, Poaching
RightsCopyright for scholarly resources published in RUcore is retained by the copyright holder. By virtue of its appearance in this open access medium, you are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. Other uses, such as reproduction or republication, may require the permission of the copyright holder.