Citation & Export
Simple citation
Fishman, Daniel B. & Messer, Stanley B. (2013).
Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(2), 156-161 This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3JS9RGSExport
Description
Pragmatic Case Studies as a Source of Unity in Applied Psychology (2013)
Review of General Psychology 17(2): 156-161 This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record..
VersionAccepted Manuscript (AM)
AbstractTo unify or not to unify applied psychology: that is the question. In this article we review pendulum swings in the historical efforts to answer this question—from a comprehensive, positivist, “top-down,” deductive yes between the 1930s and the early 60s, to a postmodern no since then. A rationale and proposal for a limited, “bottom-up,” inductive yes in applied psychology is then presented, employing a case-based paradigm that integrates both positivist and postmodern themes and components. This paradigm is labeled “pragmatic psychology” and, its specific use of case studies, the “Pragmatic Case Study Method” (“PCS Method”). We call for the creation of peer-reviewed journal-databases of pragmatic case studies as a foundational source of unifying applied knowledge in our discipline. As one example, the potential of the PCS Method for unifying different angles of theoretical regard is illustrated in an area of applied psychology, psychotherapy, via the case of Mrs. B. The article then turns to the broader historical and epistemological arguments for the unifying nature of the PCS Method in both applied and basic psychology.
SubjectsUnity in applied psychology, Case studies, Positivism, Postmodernism, Philosophical pragmatism, Pragmatism, Pragmatic Case Study Method, Pragmatic case studies
RightsCopyright for scholarly resources published in RUcore is retained by the copyright holder. By virtue of its appearance in this open access medium, you are free to use this resource, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings. Other uses, such as reproduction or republication, may require the permission of the copyright holder.
